malcolmlewis wrote:
[color=blue]
[/QUOTE]
Hi
OK, so on the misbehaving systems do the have all the same network
cards and firmware?
lspci -nnk |grep Ethernet -A3
> ethtool <interface> |grep Wake
> lshw -class network
I built a copy of lshw here for you to use as a test;
https://build.opensuse.org/package/binaries/home:malcolmlewis:SLE_11_SPn_General/lshw?repository=SLE_11_SP3
Just click the ‘go to download repository’ and just grab the lshw rpm
and install temporarily.
If the cards are all the same on good and bad systems, it’s either some
hardware issue to follow up with DELL, else are the systems clustered
on the same switch, maybe some erroneous network traffic triggering the
WoL event (use wireshark or tcpdump to analyze traffic)?
[/color]
The “good” one:
lspci -nnk |grep Ethernet -A3
00:19.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 82579LM Gigabit
Network Connection [8086:1502] (rev 04)
Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:052c]
Kernel driver in use: e1000e
Kernel modules: e1000e
lshw -class network
*-network
description: Ethernet interface
product: 82579LM Gigabit Network Connection
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 19
bus info: pci@0000:00:19.0
logical name: em1
version: 04
serial: f8:b1:56:a4:e2:06
size: 100Mbit/s
capacity: 1Gbit/s
width: 32 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: pm msi bus_master cap_list ethernet physical tp
10bt 10bt-fd 100bt 100bt-fd 1000bt-fd autonegotiation
configuration: autonegotiation=on broadcast=yes driver=e1000e
driverversion=2.1.4-k duplex=full firmware=0.13-4 ip=192.168.1.175
latency=0 link=yes multicast=yes port=twisted pair speed=100Mbit/s
resources: irq:43 memory:f7c00000-f7c1ffff
memory:f7c38000-f7c38fff ioport:f060(size=32)
ethtool em1
Settings for em1:
Supported ports: [ TP ]
Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Full
Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Full
Advertised pause frame use: No
Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
Speed: 100Mb/s
Duplex: Full
Port: Twisted Pair
PHYAD: 2
Transceiver: internal
Auto-negotiation: on
MDI-X: on
Supports Wake-on: pumbg
Wake-on: g
Current message level: 0x00000007 (7)
drv probe link
Link detected: yes
The “bad” one:
lspci -nnk |grep Ethernet -A3
00:19.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 82579LM Gigabit
Network Connection [8086:1502] (rev 04)
Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:052c]
Kernel driver in use: e1000e
Kernel modules: e1000e
lshw -class network
*-network
description: Ethernet interface
product: 82579LM Gigabit Network Connection
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 19
bus info: pci@0000:00:19.0
logical name: em1
version: 04
serial: f8:b1:56:a5:72:58
size: 100Mbit/s
capacity: 1Gbit/s
width: 32 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: pm msi bus_master cap_list ethernet physical tp
10bt 10bt-fd 100bt 100bt-fd 1000bt-fd autonegotiation
configuration: autonegotiation=on broadcast=yes driver=e1000e
driverversion=2.1.4-k duplex=full firmware=0.13-4 ip=192.168.1.176
latency=0 link=yes multicast=yes port=twisted pair speed=100Mbit/s
resources: irq:42 memory:f7c00000-f7c1ffff
memory:f7c38000-f7c38fff ioport:f060(size=32)
ethtool em1
Settings for em1:
Supported ports: [ TP ]
Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Full
Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Full
Advertised pause frame use: No
Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
Speed: 100Mb/s
Duplex: Full
Port: Twisted Pair
PHYAD: 2
Transceiver: internal
Auto-negotiation: on
MDI-X: on
Supports Wake-on: pumbg
Wake-on: g
Current message level: 0x00000007 (7)
drv probe link
Link detected: yes
Looks very much the same to me. Dell is known for small but annoying
variations in their hardware within one series of Desktop systems, but
at least the NIC and it’s firmware should be the same.
I agree that it is most likely a BIOS bug. But then I might have a hard
time convincing DELL to fix this for me. Actually they do not seem to
care about SLED. At least a quick search in the YES certification data
base does not show any results. But I’m still willing to take another try.
Günther