weird messages concerning hpsa with journalctl

SUSE Product Topics SLES Configure-Administer
1

Hi,

am i the first asking s.th. related to SLES 15 :rolleyes:
I have two HP Proliant, one ML 350 G6 and one ML 350 G9. Installation of SLES 15 went fine, both are running now.
But in both i get weird messages concerning hpsa (that’s the module for RAID controllers):

Jul 31 17:02:55 linux-i97i kernel: HP HPSA Driver (v 3.4.20-125)
Jul 31 17:02:55 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa 0000:04:00.0: can’t disable ASPM; OS doesn’t have ASPM control
Jul 31 17:02:55 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa 0000:04:00.0: Logical aborts not supported
Jul 31 17:02:55 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa 0000:04:00.0: HP SSD Smart Path aborts not supported
Jul 31 17:02:56 linux-i97i kernel: scsi host0: hpsa
Jul 31 17:02:56 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa can’t handle SMP requests
Jul 31 17:02:56 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa 0000:04:00.0: scsi 0:0:0:0: added RAID HP P410i controller SSDSmartPathCap- En- Exp=1
Jul 31 17:02:56 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa 0000:04:00.0: scsi 0:0:1:0: masked Direct-Access HP EF0600FARNA PHYS DRV SSDSmartPathCap- En- Exp=0
Jul 31 17:02:56 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa 0000:04:00.0: scsi 0:0:2:0: masked Direct-Access HP EH0600JDYTL PHYS DRV SSDSmartPathCap- En- Exp=0
Jul 31 17:02:56 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa 0000:04:00.0: scsi 0:0:3:0: masked Direct-Access HP EF0600FARNA PHYS DRV SSDSmartPathCap- En- Exp=0
Jul 31 17:02:56 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa 0000:04:00.0: scsi 0:0:4:0: masked Direct-Access HP EF0600FARNA PHYS DRV SSDSmartPathCap- En- Exp=0
Jul 31 17:02:56 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa 0000:04:00.0: scsi 0:0:5:0: masked Direct-Access HP EF0600FARNA PHYS DRV SSDSmartPathCap- En- Exp=0
Jul 31 17:02:56 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa 0000:04:00.0: scsi 0:0:6:0: masked Enclosure PMCSIERA SRC 8x6G enclosure SSDSmartPathCap- En- Exp=0
Jul 31 17:02:56 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa 0000:04:00.0: scsi 0:1:0:0: added Direct-Access HP LOGICAL VOLUME RAID-5 SSDSmartPathCap- En- Exp=1
Jul 31 17:02:56 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa can’t handle SMP requests

In both the same messages. Is that s.th. to be afraid of ?
Or should i ask on the KML ?
It’s kernel 4.12.14-25.3-default 64bit.

Thanks.

Bernd

2

On 01/08/18 15:14, berndgsflinux wrote:
[color=blue]

am i the first asking s.th. related to SLES 15 :rolleyes:
I have two HP Proliant, one ML 350 G6 and one ML 350 G9. Installation of
SLES 15 went fine, both are running now.
But in both i get weird messages concerning hpsa (that’s the module for
RAID controllers):

Jul 31 17:02:55 linux-i97i kernel: HP HPSA Driver (v 3.4.20-125)
Jul 31 17:02:55 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa 0000:04:00.0: can’t disable
ASPM; OS doesn’t have ASPM control
Jul 31 17:02:55 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa 0000:04:00.0: Logical aborts not
supported
Jul 31 17:02:55 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa 0000:04:00.0: HP SSD Smart Path
aborts not supported
Jul 31 17:02:56 linux-i97i kernel: scsi host0: hpsa
Jul 31 17:02:56 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa can’t handle SMP requests
Jul 31 17:02:56 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa 0000:04:00.0: scsi 0:0:0:0:
added RAID HP P410i controller
SSDSmartPathCap- En- Exp=1
Jul 31 17:02:56 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa 0000:04:00.0: scsi 0:0:1:0:
masked Direct-Access HP EF0600FARNA PHYS DRV
SSDSmartPathCap- En- Exp=0
Jul 31 17:02:56 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa 0000:04:00.0: scsi 0:0:2:0:
masked Direct-Access HP EH0600JDYTL PHYS DRV
SSDSmartPathCap- En- Exp=0
Jul 31 17:02:56 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa 0000:04:00.0: scsi 0:0:3:0:
masked Direct-Access HP EF0600FARNA PHYS DRV
SSDSmartPathCap- En- Exp=0
Jul 31 17:02:56 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa 0000:04:00.0: scsi 0:0:4:0:
masked Direct-Access HP EF0600FARNA PHYS DRV
SSDSmartPathCap- En- Exp=0
Jul 31 17:02:56 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa 0000:04:00.0: scsi 0:0:5:0:
masked Direct-Access HP EF0600FARNA PHYS DRV
SSDSmartPathCap- En- Exp=0
Jul 31 17:02:56 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa 0000:04:00.0: scsi 0:0:6:0:
masked Enclosure PMCSIERA SRC 8x6G enclosure
SSDSmartPathCap- En- Exp=0
Jul 31 17:02:56 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa 0000:04:00.0: scsi 0:1:0:0:
added Direct-Access HP LOGICAL VOLUME RAID-5
SSDSmartPathCap- En- Exp=1
Jul 31 17:02:56 linux-i97i kernel: hpsa can’t handle SMP requests

In both the same messages. Is that s.th. to be afraid of ?
Or should i ask on the KML ?
It’s kernel 4.12.14-25.3-default 64bit.[/color]

I don’t have this hardware but from researching I think from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557655#c23 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557655#c29 that this is okay.

HTH.

Simon
SUSE Knowledge Partner

If you find this post helpful and are logged into the web interface,
please show your appreciation and click on the star below. Thanks.