Hello,
I was discussing an opportunity(Storage/VirtualSAN) with our Sales Contact at SUSE, and the guy at SUSE advised me
Do you agree with the statement, that SES is a tier 3 storage(for backup and archival etc) ? is not meant to replace the tier 1 Storage.
sharfuddin Wrote in message:
[color=blue]
I was discussing an opportunity(Storage/VirtualSAN) with our Sales
Contact at SUSE, and the guy at SUSE advised me[color=green]Suse enterprise storage positioning is for cost/gb of use cases - data
retention, archival, backup etc. If this is not the case, you may not
want to push for this customer[/color]
Do you agree with the statement, that SES is a tier 3 storage(for backup
and archival etc) ? is not meant to replace the tier 1 Storage.[/color]
No I don’t agree with the above statement and I don’t think it’s
SUSE’s aim for the SUSE Enterprise Storage (SES) product. You may
find https://www.linux.com/news/featured-blogs/
200-libby-clark/815268-suse-explains-why-the-fut
ure-of-enterprise-storage-is-open-source (URL may not wrap)
helpful.
Simon Flood
SUSE Knowledge Partner
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
Thanks for your very input/feedback. I checked the URL(https://www.linux.com/news/featured-blogs/200-libby-clark/815268-suse-explains-why-the-future-of-enterprise-storage-is-open-source) you shared and there I found a response from Mr. Jason Phippen, SUSE’s head of global product marketing. as:
[color=blue]
SUSE is building our technology on top of Ceph and deploying our engineering resources to build and deliver storage solutions. Initial use cases will target archive, object and bulk (block) solutions.
[/color]
don’t you think it sounds pretty close to: